More SLIPP... on the SHuswap Lake

There have been achievements of SLIPP, such as; the bringing together of the governemnet agencies (this has helped to deal with understanding a variety if issues on the lake),  the Premier awards recognizing the innovative and effectiveness of SLIPP,  as well it helped with organizing the policing of the lake last year. There has been14 different agencies working together which is different as often they work in separate cells. All together, with in kind donations from government agencies it comes to over $1 million in the 3 year proposed pilot project. There is and has been a lot invested in time and money into the Shuswap Lake system.

Terms of reference; were to make sure that that there would a watch dog to be; responsible for the funding, to share  and address information amongst the agencies. All making sure that things get done and monitor risks. Finally and maybe most important  making sure the budget is spent properly in getting things done.

Who votes especially on financial matters? This was a long discussion and debate, it was decided; for a one year trial that ¾ of the votes will decide the direction of SLIPP. It would include the financial decisions for which was an issue as Ted & I pay a lion’s share (over 50%) for SLIPP. However in order to maintain the good will, flow and continuity of the process we agreed with the voting process. The main intent is; that we work towards the benefit of the lake. A positive twist to the donation SLIPP is a First Nation representative felt it was important that they too could be contributor.  There was an interest in being a contributor if the band council decided they would or would not want to be involved.   It was suggested that there be no proxy as teleconferences could be used. There was no clear understanding if alternates could be used or not, that will be cleared later. It was understood that Steering members would pay their own way to the meetings. The Fraser Basin Council will charge a 6% administrating fee for managing the funds of SLIPP, which is supposed to be a good deal. Future meetings could take ½ day with presentations provided, if requested.

 Priorities set in 2011 were for;

1)      Water quality monitoring(organizing of all the data from all sources of water smaples) including cumulative effects.

2)      Assessment on recreation management

3)      Education compliance and enforcement

4)       Stakeholder, meetings reporting expenses.

5)      Foreshore development